Showing posts with label Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Academy Awards Week: Best Visual Effects-from Star Wars to Present

Today there is one thing that bring audiences to the movies more than famous actors, and that is the visual effects.  From the creation of new lands like in Avatar to giant robots trying to save the world in the Transformers series, movie goers are drawn into films because of amazing visual effects.

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away this category had a different name at the Academy Awards.  From 1939 to 1962 the award was called Best Special Effects and was shared with the Sound Effects nominations.  This may explain why the famous burning scene did not clinch this award for Gone with the Wind in 1939, but I still am baffled as to how this film lost this award.  I digress.  In 1963 the award was called Best Special Effects, and from 1964 through 1971 the award was called Best Special Visual Effects. Ironically in 1972 the category received the name it has today Best Visual Effects.  From 1972-1997 the visual effects award was a special achievement award, but in 1977 the award also was formed to be what it we know today

What film helped launch this category to what it is today?  In 1977 George Lucas brought to life the visual masterpiece (at the time) Star Wars.  When audiences saw what Lucas had done with these visual effects creating a whole new galaxy filled with a death star, tie fighters, wookies, light sabers and so much more the world was blown away.  Audiences lined up and made this film a phenomenon.  Star Wars changed the landscape for visual effects and made audiences, and people continue to push the boundaries further and further.  Lucas took audiences to a new galaxy in a way that was never done before, and this made film makers who had an interest in working with this technology push studios to spend more money to make films that not only explosions but made the extraordinary possible.


Star Wars was the first winner of the Best Visual Effects Academy Award (award with that title), and that is fitting.  in the following years the award went to Superman (1978), Alien (1979), Empire Strikes Back (1980), Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981), E.T. (1982), Terminator 2: Judgement Day (1991) Jurassic Park (1993), Titanic (1997), The Matrix (1999), The Lord of the Rings Trilogy (2001-2003), Avatar (2009), and Inception (2010).  

Each of these films listed above is pretty impressive.  These films are also some of the highest grossing films of all time.  Audiences love visual effects and if you look at this category today the 5 films in this category for 2012 have almost doubled the gross of the 9 Best Picture nominees.  So the big questions are, is Hollywood missing something and where is the disconnect?  Since 1977 when the category became what it is today 13 of the winners have been Best Picture nominees.  13 out of the the last 35 years.  Sure there have also been Best Picture nominees that have been in this category that did not win, but usually when a Best Picture nominee was in this category it won.

Image DetailI feel as though this problem speaks to a much larger disconnect within the Academy.  Awardsdaily.com released statistics of the Academy voters and it was no surprise that most of the voters were old white men who had not been nominated or won an award themselves.  How does this effect this category?  Most of the films that fit within this category would be cited as genre films, like Rise of the Planet of the Apes or Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2.  Beyond Lord of the Rings the Academy has proven to avoid genre films like the plague.  Voters go for films centered around the Holocaust or wars rather than the earth being overrun by apes or a boy wizard because they think this means people will take them more seriously.  the problem with this logic is that people, the American public would rather see them nominate/honor films like this years Apes and Harry Potter not The Artist.  I hope the Academy takes a look at this delineation and does something about this problem.  Note: The solution is not to create genre awards like at the Broadcast Film Critics Awards, but to realize that genre films have a place in the film time capsule.

Onto this year's nominees in this category, and here they are:
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 
Hugo
Real Steel
Rise of the Planet of the Apes
Transformer: Dark of the Moon

Logically the winner will be Hugo.  Since 1977 there has been no film that was nominated for Best Picture and did not win this award.  Hugo would be the first to lose.  Before I tackle who I think will win, I am going to rule out the obvious.  Real Steel is the first to get crossed off, this has no shot.  Transformers is out too, if neither of the first two films could win, the third film is out.  This leaves three. I would pick Potter, but bloggers and journalist seem to have a strong yearning for Apes.  Based on history I am going to go with Hugo and Apes as a very close second.

Prediction: Hugo
Very Close Second: Rise of the Planet of the Apes
Spoiler: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2

Monday, February 20, 2012

Academy Awards Week: Best Cinematography

One of my favorite parts of a film is the cinematography.  Many people do not know what cinematography is, or how it is one of the most essential parts to a film.  Cinematography is the creation of film images.  The cinematographer will of use a movie camera with film or digital imagery to capture what they want to show the audience.

The American Society of Cinematographers (ASC) define cinematography as "a creative and interpretive process that culminates in the authorship of an original work of art rather than the simple recording of a physical event. Cinematography is not a subcategory of photography. Rather, photography is but one craft that the cinematographer uses in addition to other physical, organizational, managerial, interpretive and image-manipulating techniques to effect one coherent process."


At the advent of film history the cinematographer was the director, but as technology advanced these two roles became different.  The director was no longer the camera operator.  New technologies like color, and wide screen necessitated someone who was a specialist and their sole task was to capture the images and operate the camera.


As film has evolved from the silent era to present day the cinematographers continue to create visually beautiful images for the audiences to see.  During the silent era cinematographers had to work extra hard to make sure that without sound the visual created a cohesive element to the story.  As newer technologies present them self (or return) like 3D cinematographers have to work hard attain an image that captures the genuine emotional experience of the scene.


This year there were several films that did a fantastic job utilizing the brilliance of their cinematographer, here are my personal favorites.


1-The Tree of Life-Emmanual Lubezsi (director of photography)

tree-thumb-500x268-15697\

2-Drive-Newton Thomas Sigel (director of photography)

drive2

3-Hugo-Robert Richardson

Hugo62

4-Shame-Sean Bobbitt

Shame


5-Melancholia-Manuel Alberto Claro


Melancholia


6-The Artist-Guillame Schiffman

CA.1205.top.shots.
7-Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2-Eduardo Serra

Image Detail

8-The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo-Jeffrey Cronenwerth

Dragon Tattoo Snowy

9-Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy-Hoyte Van Hoytema

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy


10-Take Shelter-Adam Stone

takeshelter1

These are just merely the top ten on my list there are many other films like Moneyball, Rise of the Planet of the Apes, Martha Marcy May Marlene, Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol and many more that could be included amongst this wonderful work.  The cinematographer is one of the hardest working film professionals today.  They have the responsibility to make the film's visual look and feel connect to the emotional aspects of the film.  No, they do not just have to make things look pretty, but in a sense they need to make things look as though each image tells a story.

So who made the cut for the Academy Awards:

The Artist
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Hugo
The Tree of Life 
War Horse 

This is a tough category to predict.  The ASC Guild Award went the the best cinematography of the year, The Tree of Life, but will this line-up at the Academy Awards?  I hope so, but I am not confident.  I think any of these five films could win, but I am pretty sure with little to no passion behind it War Horse is out.  I was a little surprised it made the Best Picture category.  While Dragon Tattoo has some beautiful cinematography it does not have a Best Picture nomination, do the two go hand in hand, not always, but I think the film will go home empty handed.  This leave three films open to three different scenarios come Oscar night.

1) The Artist has a clean sweep.  I do not think it will have a clean sweep, especially since the Academy is catching some flack for rubber stamping this film.  While I do agree the cinematography is one of the best parts of this film because it captures the silence so well, I do not think this film will capture this trophy on Oscar night.

2) Hugo sweeps the technical categories.  Hugo has 11 nominations and a lot of across the board support in the technical categories.  This is a beautiful film, and I would not begrudge the win.  At the moment I am torn between this and The Tree of Life.


3) Justice-The Tree of Life wins because, well it's the best cinematography of the year.  Even those people who did not love, or did not get this film still state the cinematography was amazing.

Will and Should Win: The Tree of Life
Very Close Second: Hugo
Spoiler: The Artist

Monday, February 6, 2012

2011 Top Ten Films of the Year

I know this list is late, but here are my top ten films of 2011.  This took a lot of effort and energy, and I hope you agree and disagree, but I made this list to spark conversation.  I finally saw all the movies I needed to make this list.


1-The Tree of Life-Like, Love or even hate this film this is potentially the most admirable film of the year.  Director Terrence Malick made this a passion project for many many years, and the end result is a breathtaking  film experience that transcends all other films this year. Malick's direction is the best of the year he works hard to create a piece of work that has so many layers it will take me years upon years to study and understand the depth to his work.  While in my review I did call this self indulgent (and I still think it is for at least 10 minutes) it still takes film to a different level that films rarely achieve.  Emmanuel Lubezski did the cinematography for the film, and I was blown away.  Lubezski's cinematography is some of the best shot work I have ever seen!

The film is mostly a visual experience, but the performances of the main cast add to this visual strong work.  Hunter McCracken is the best younger performance of the year; he said more with his face than many actors say with hundred of lines. Prior to this year I have to say I admired Brad Pitt for his comedic acting like in Burn After Reading or the Ocean's films but never thought he had the chops to do drama.  This film (along with Moneyball) changed my mind.  Malick brought out the strongest Pitt  role to date as the father with a long suffering relationship with his wife and sons.  This role is so complex and layered that it impressed me.  In her first mention on this list, Jessica Chastain gives a quietly subtle performance as Pitt's wife, and she is incredible!

This film is a spiritual experience that chronicles a families journey through paralleled experiences with the beginning of time.  In true Malick style the film has very little dialogue, but it does not use this as a gimmick.  This is the better quiet film of the year.

2-Take Shelter-The most under rated film of 2011, is the second best film of the year.  This coarse film about a man who fears he is succumbing to his mental illness like his mother, or are the visions he is having a signal of the end of days?  Jeff Nichols direction and screenplay are phenomenal; he captures this dark terse emotional breakdown of Simon (Michael Shannon).  Shannon is an excellent actor, and his performance in this film takes this film to another level; his visions/dreams create a haunting painful experience that starts to tear him away from his family and friends.  Jessica Chastain plays his suffering wife Samantha, in her strongest role of the year (and least talked about); she takes her performance to a whole different level  Chastain is more than the wife dealing with her husbands potential psychosis; she is the epitome of a strong female character.  The script and acting get most of the credit for making this film great, but the cinematography in the scenes where Curtis is seeing his different visions like the flock of birds creates a bitter chill that creeps up your spine.


3-Drive-The second most under rated film (by award shows) is a beautifully shot, directed, acted, and scored film entitled Drive.  Drive is about a nameless character played by Ryan Gosling that is both a driver for stunts on films, and has aided in helping men in robberies.  The opening sequence of this film helps set the frame for brilliant direction from Nicholas Winding Refn and the palpable cinematography from Newton Thomas Sigel.  Refn's direction won him Best Director at the Cannes Film Festival, a prize he deserved.  Refn's work pieces together the strength of the screenplay along with Sigel's cinematography to create a strong well plotted, and deep action film.  My two favorite things about this film (besides the fact that it stars the incredibly versatile Ryan Gosling) are the score from Cliff Martinez and the dark supporting performance from Albert Brooks.  Martinez's score was ruled ineligible by the Academy to compete for the Oscars, but in my opinion this was the best score of the year.  Martinez seemed to listen to Brook's character Bernie Rose when he stated "I used to produce movies. In the 80s. Kind of like action films. Sexy stuff. One critic called them European. I thought they were shit."  The score and the credit sequence capture this embellished 80s style.  Brooks is the best supporting performance of the year; he is dark, yet comical and works with great ease. What a great film with a wonderful lead performance from Gosling that makes this film near perfection. 



4-Shame-A raw powerfully emotional film that delves into the dark abyss of sex addiction. Steve McQueen has crafted a film so intimate that lacks intimacy and focuses on the sheer act of sex.  The film's star Michael Fassbender is brilliant in this film, and often provides some of his best moments with his facial expressions.  In the scene with his co worker where he is attempting to have sex with her, and can't perform his face looks shocked, stunned, and as though he then realizes sex can not be an act of love.  The editing of this film is also brilliant and helps to showcase Fassbender's performance.  While on the train home from his night of varying sexual acts the editor pieces together the different sexual acts to suggest such an intense emotional experience.  Meanwhile Fassbender emotionally breaks down as though he knows he is spiraling toward a much darker place.  Carey Mulligan plays his sister who is a brilliant role that stands in juxtaposition to her brother.  Yet the only real difference is her naive portrayal of the younger sister.  The only difference as she points out is that he has a job.  My favorite scene that was shot for this film is Fassbender running through Manhattan at night, the scene is brilliantly shot and connects things to make this an excellent film.

5-Hugo-The best film I have ever seen in 3D.  I have never seen that actually uses 3D throughout the entire film that gets the purpose of 3D like this film.  Even Avatar director James Cameron stated this was the best 3D experience he has ever had.  3D aside this is a beautiful film experience that captures the essence of childhood innocence along with the birth of film and the famed director Georges Méliès.  The story is told from the point of view of Hugo Cabret (Asa Butterfield) who lives in a clock tower and has a passion for adventure and innovation.  Butterfield's performance is quite brilliant and he does a wonderful job bringing this story to life.  The ensemble is comprised of Ben Kingsley, Chloe Grace Moretz, Sascha Baron Cohen, Emily Mortimer, Richard Griffiths, Frances de la Tour and a few more, and they come together to create one magical beautiful film experience.  This was a labor of love for director Martin Scorsese, whose passionate work in film has paved the way for him to create this beautifully shot, edited, and visually awe inspiring film.  Scorsese is a master in the director's chair and this change in direction of his films proves his brilliance in creating works of art.


6-A Separation- This is the only film on my list that is not in English.  A Separation is an Iranian film that takes the simple act of well, a marital separation and takes two families down a path neither wants to go down.  The film's pacing may seem slow to some but director and writer Asghar Farhadi uses his brilliant strokes in his screenplay and direction to create an intense build to an incredibly emotional final act.  Farhadi's work behind the scenes has created a story that is truly Iranian, but transcends cultural boundaries at the same moment.  The writing catapults the audience into a melodramatic world that never goes too far to become overwrought. Watching each family work through their emotional and financial difficulties is not only a test to the brilliants screenplay, but the tremendous acting.  Peymann Maadi plays the Nader who is going through the separation with his wife Simin played by Leila Hatami.  Maadi and Simin have such great chemistry as a couple whose best years together have withered away.  While the script shows there was once love, the acting by both parties conveys the emotional loss of their marriage which ultimately create extreme distress for their daughter.  The main premise of their separation seems to be surrounded by two things Nader struggle to want to stay with his father who has Alzheimer's disease, and Smin's desire to want to move to Europe where they can provide a better life for their daughter.  As Simin leave her family behind, Nader hires Razeih (Sarah Bayat) to take care of his father, and their lives are forever changed, all because of a separation.



7-Midnight in Paris-Charming, nostalgic, witty, and a beautiful tribute to the city of lights throughout the years. Woody Allen's first love may be New York City, but his mistress is Paris.  Midnight in Paris is one of the most likable of the films of the year.  The Woodman's script is so smart and captures the journey of a young writer as he tries to find his voice in the present day, only to find himself transported to 1920s Paris connecting with the roots of literature, art, and culture.  After Robert Altman Allen knows how to bring together an ensemble that pull things together so effortlessly.  With Owen Wilson, Rachel McAdams, Marion Cotillard, Kathy Bates, Corey Stoll, Adrien Brody, Allison Pill, and man others this is one impressive combination.  These actors may be the stars, but the real star is the beauty of Paris and the cinematography that captures just how inspiring this city is.


8-Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2-Not only is this the blockbuster of the year, but this film is one of the most gratifying conclusions to a film series ever.  Fans often wait for their films to provide a satisfying conclusion and  director David Yates provided an amazing concluding chapter.  This film balanced the wit, and darkness of the entire series (more darkness).  The film is visually stunning, providing some amazing cinematography, that takes the viewer through a visual sumptuous masterpiece. The performances were also some of the best they have ever been with Radcliffe proving that not only has he grown up in front of our eyes but his acting skills improved vastly.  Yet there is one person we all loved, Severus Snape, played by Alan Rickman, what a performance!

9-Martha Marcy May Marlene-The most haunting/terrifying film of the year. Sean Durkin's first feature film is  brilliant and tells the tale of a young girl named Martha (Elizabeth Olsen) who finds her way into a cult.  Durkin's writing and direction keeps the audience on the edge of their seat; he builds up this incredibly tense situation that leaves the viewer emotionally wrought.  Durkin's use of the ingenue Elizabeth Olsen is another masterful feat.  Olsen is the breakthrough performer of the year.  As you watch Martha go from being part of the cult to being with her family and paralleled paranoia play out you can see every emotion in her face.  Olsen goes from becoming a forceful follower of the brilliant John Hawkes who plays Patrick the cult leader to a scared little girl seeking protection from her sister after she escapes.  The editing on this film helps intertwine the emotional experience, and makes this an amazing film.


10-Moneyball-I remember hearing many people say, another film about baseball it's going to be the same thing again, I remember thinking the same thoughts.  It's not.  Combine the skills of director Bennett Miller (Capote), writers Aaron Sorkin and Steve Zaillian, and get Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill to work together in some of their best work, and you get one of the best films of the year.  The movie is not about baseball.  I repeat the movie is not about baseball, but if in the wrong hands this could have been handled wrong.  This film centers around Billy Beane (Pitt)  who was the general manager of the A's and the fact that at the end of great year he lost three great players to different teams because of money.  Beane meets Peter Brand (Hill) and together they come up with a system that would change the game forever!  This film is about teamwork, leadership, and imbibes this wonderfully great spirit about working towards a belief in changing a system that is broken.  The film is emotionally charged enough as it focuses on Beane as a father, but also in the sense that you grow to understand what baseball means to him and how it effected his outlook. With solid editing that pieces this work together, this film takes "sports" movies to a different level.